Refuting the 'barking at print' myth

Whether or not you are using the Phonics International Programme, feel free to visit this informal 'Chat' forum!
Here you will find all sorts of interesting articles, links to research and developments - and various interesting topics! Do join in!
Post Reply
User avatar
debbie
Posts: 2598
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: UK

Refuting the 'barking at print' myth

Post by debbie »

Specific Reading Comprehension Disability: Major Problem, Myth, or Misnomer?

Mercedes Spencer*, Jamie M. Quinn andRichard K. Wagner

Article first published online: 24 JAN 2014

Learning Disabilities Research & Practice

Volume 29, Issue 1, pages 3–9, February 2014

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 12024/full
Abstract

The goal of the present study was to test three competing hypotheses about the nature of comprehension problems of students who are poor in reading comprehension. Participants in the study were first, second, and third graders, totaling nine cohorts and over 425,000 participants in all. The pattern of results was consistent across all cohorts: Less than 1 percent of first- through third-grade students who scored as poor in reading comprehension were adequate in both decoding and vocabulary. Although poor reading comprehension certainly qualifies as a major problem rather than a myth, the term specific reading comprehension disability is a misnomer: Individuals with problems in reading comprehension that are not attributable to poor word recognition have comprehension problems that are general to language comprehension rather than specific to reading. Implications for assessment and intervention are discussed.
Debbie Hepplewhite
Post Reply