The quality and content of training in our universities:

Whether or not you are using the Phonics International Programme, feel free to visit this informal 'Chat' forum!
Here you will find all sorts of interesting articles, links to research and developments - and various interesting topics! Do join in!
Post Reply
User avatar
debbie
Posts: 2596
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: UK

The quality and content of training in our universities:

Post by debbie »

http://rrf.org.uk/messageforum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4521

The link above leads to a response by Susan Godsland (UK Reading Reform Foundation) to a piece by Justine Earl on the 'Teacher Training Resource Bank'.

Justine's piece draws attention to an old Teachers TV video which features myself and Ruth Miskin amongst others. Some of Justine's comments raise questions about her bias and undermining of commercial programme writers and of the personal integrity of Ruth and myself.

The question is as to whether Justine's piece is a reflection of many other academics in our universities or limited to her own particular viewpoint.

Meanwhile, other university lecturers have approached me and the Reading Reform Foundation seeking phonics experts who can provide training workshops for student teachers. This is good news!

Is it going to continue to be a matter of 'chance', then, as to the content and quality of training in reading instruction received by students in our teacher-training establishments?

Susan Godsland's website is extremely informative and kept well up-to-date:

www.dyslexics.org.uk
Debbie Hepplewhite
User avatar
debbie
Posts: 2596
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: UK

Post by debbie »

I have received reassurance from the new government about the training of student teachers in the universities. Below are some extracts from the letter I received including reference at the bottom regarding Justine Earl's piece on the Teacher Training Resource Bank (TTRB) which I queried with the government:

Here is part of the response I received:
....Initial Teacher Training (ITT) providers are fully accountable to the Secretary of State for the quality of the teacher training which they provide. The Secretary of State’s requirements for accredited providers of ITT stipulate that they must ensure ‘training is designed to enable trainee teachers to demonstrate that they have met all of the Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) standards.’ Standard Q15 requires those recommended for QTS to ‘know and understand the relevant statutory and non-statutory curricula and frameworks, including those provided through the national strategies for their subjects/curriculum areas, applicable to the age and ability range for which they are trained.’ For primary teachers this includes early reading using phonics.

In terms of the training of teachers to use synthetic phonics, this has been an explicit expectation since 2006. The TDA guidance accompanying the QTS standards sets out the expectation that 'All primary trainees must have the knowledge, skills and understanding to teach early reading using the Simple View of Reading, in accordance with the recommendations of the independent review of the teaching of early reading’ (the Rose Review, March 2006). This wording reflects the core expectation of a systematic approach to synthetic phonics, currently based on the National Strategies ‘Letters and Sounds’ as the key resource.

The purpose of the Teacher Training Resource Bank (TTRB) is to provide access to providers of ITT to a reliable source of evidence to inform high quality training. It provides a ready mechanism for effective communication of emerging priorities, although fresh commissions are embargoed at present in line with Cabinet Office guidelines on market communications activity.

The TDA are currently undertaking a major review of the site content. All materials relating to the teaching of phonics and mathematics, are being reviewed in a fast-track process, to be complete in a matter of days, and any which appear to conflict with current or emerging policy will be removed. The Teachers’ TV clip and the accompanying review will be removed immediately, and a banner placed on the site, in line with other government funded services and agencies, stating that as a new government took office on the 11th May, the content on the site may not reflect current government policy.
Update about training in two Universities:

Further good news is that I enjoyed a busy two days trip to the University of Cumbria where I presented Phonics International and was able to speak about synthetic phonics teaching in general terms to three student groups and two groups of leading literacy teachers. Although these sessions were brief, nevertheless I was enabled to speak to nearly 400 people in this way at two different campuses - Carlisle and Lancaster.

A close colleague of mine was also invited to a University in London this week and she was able to speak to around 120 students about synthetic phonics teaching. She introduced them to several reputable synthetic phonics programme to raise their awareness about their choices.

It would be really good if more universities called upon the services of independent synthetic phonics trainers to present good programmes and talk about synthetic phonics teaching to student teachers. :wink:

The staff I liaised with at the University of Cumbria described their goal of encouraging student teachers to evaluate phonics programmes in addition to the UK government's Letters and Sounds. This is exactly what I would suggest is necessary and right.

Currently, the pressure on Universities appears to be to account only for a focus on the government's Letters and Sounds document which is put forward as a 'programme'. My suggestion is that this is to fall short of the level of 'training' that student teachers require. The very fact that Letters and Sounds is considered to be a 'programme' is worrying when it is really guidance with some details and no resources - this does not stand up to scrutiny as a 'full programme'.
Debbie Hepplewhite
User avatar
debbie
Posts: 2596
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: UK

Post by debbie »

The University of Cumbria is developing its course for training student teachers in synthetic phonics teaching including looking closely at various synthetic phonics programmes to evaluate them.

This is great news and I look forward to hearing more about developments such as this at the University of Cumbria. Well done!

I have now provided training for student teachers at the London Metropolitan University and it was good to see the Literacy Department there determined to do their best for their students in training them in synthetic phonics teaching even though they have their doubts about the Clackmannanshire research per se.

There was some willingness to accept that good systematic synthetic phonics teaching may well be the best teaching possible regardless of any academic debate over the research.
Debbie Hepplewhite
Post Reply